Legal Opinion

Anglin v. Marr Canning Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 13, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Benton Circuit Court; W. A. Dickson, Judge; This ease is controlled by the opinion of this court in the case of Wilcox v. Citizens Laundry, delivered April 21,1913, and not reported.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Benton Circuit Court; W. A. Dickson, Judge; This ease is controlled by the opinion of this court in the case of Wilcox v. Citizens Laundry, delivered April 21,1913, and not reported. See also 2 Thompson on Corporations, 1693; 163 N. Y. 580; 96 Ark. 493. Appellees Marr and Gravette were estopped from denying liability as partners, and not only should the court have directed a verdict against the canning company, Zierenberg, Gravette and Marr, but also, when the jury returned a verdict against Zierenberg alone, it should have sustained appellant’s motion for judgment…

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

Prior to the 25th of February, 1920, W. J. Zierenberg, F. M. Marr and E. M. Gravette were partners engaged in the canning business under the firm name of Marr Canning Company at Cave Springs, Benton County, Arkansas. On the above date Zierenberg bought the interests of Gravette and Marr in the business, and the partnership was dissolved. Some time after this dissolution of the partnership the following contract was entered into:

“Tomato Grower’s Contract.
“I, James Anglin, hereby agree to devote the land and furnish everything necessary to plant and cultivate in proper manner four acres of land…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rector v. RobinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Meyer v. KrohnIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Moline Wagon Co. v. RummellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1880

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  2. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. LongSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  3. Hinton v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Keylon v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API