Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilson
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 7, 1930No. 8676PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.
February 25, 1924, the firm of Fischer Freres, of Antwerp, Belgium, desired to intervene in a certain receivership suit then pending in the District Court of the United States at Clarksdale, Miss. On that day appellee, as attorney for that firm, went with one of its members to Mills & Sons, local agents for appellant at Pine Bluff, Ark., where appellee resides, to get a cost bond to be filed in that intervention. There Fischer Freres, by W. Fischer, made application in writing for an open penalty cost bond, carrying a premium of $10. In this application the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Woodson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Chapin v. MerrillNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co. v. ArrottCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway v. HigginsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
- Tucker v. WestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1874
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Asher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- MacArthur v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Keystone Tankship Corp. v. Willamette Iron & Steel Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1963
- Moore v. Manhattan Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931