Legal Opinion

Hinton v. Brown

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 27, 1927PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This suit was brought by appellee, Brown, against appellant, Hinton, to recover on notes signed “Hinton Garage, L. T. Hinton,” dated July 24, 1923, it being alleged that “Hinton Garage’’ -was a copart-nership of whicli appellant Hinton was a member. Tlie notes sued on were renewals of prior notes, which had been executed by “Hinton Garage” to appellee’s order.

An answer was filed, in which it was denied that appellant was a partner at the time of the execution of the original notes or the renewal notes, and it was alleged that the notes sued on were usurious and void.

On the question of usury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Garvin v. LintonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  2. Pine Bluff Company v. BobbittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. Anglin v. Marr Canning Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  4. Dodd v. Axle-Nut Sign Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Commercial Credit Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Cox v. Darragh CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  3. Temple v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. First American National Bank v. McClure Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Wyckoff v. Commerce Bank of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API