Legal Opinion
Shoemaker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 24, 1992No. Nos. 2521, 2554 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Before this Court are two consolidated petitions for review. In one, Mary M. Shoemaker (Shoemaker), widow of Elisha B. Shoemaker (Claimant), deceased, seeks review of the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) reversing the referee’s decision granting Shoemaker’s fatal claim petition filed pursuant to The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §§ 1-1031. In the other, Jenmar Corporation (Employer) seeks review of that portion of the Board’s order affirming the referee’s decision granting Claimant’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Lewis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Kujawa v. Latrobe Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Volkswagen of America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Suburban Hospital, Inc. v. KirsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Rite Care Resources v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Heisey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Whitesell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013