Flowers v. United States Army, 25th Infantry Division
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ***
Husband and wife Marshall and Anna Flowers appeal pro se the district court’s dismissal of their claims against the United States Army and the individual Army defendants (“federal defendants”), and grant of summary judgment in favor of Fort Jackson Federal Credit Union and First Hawaiian Bank. The Flowers also challenge various discovery and other procedural rulings made by the district court. We affirm the challenged rulings and deny the Flowers’ two pending motions.
1. The Flowers argue that the district court erred in dismissing their claims brought pursuant to the Right to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dreier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Flowers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Bond v. U.S. Postal Service Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Harris v. Safeco Insurance Company of IllinoisDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Kathryn Lindberg McBride v. Pete Hegseth, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
- O'Neal v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024