Legal Opinion
Kathryn Lindberg McBride v. Pete Hegseth, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 28, 2026No. 1:25-cv-00444Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 KATHRYN LINDBERG MCBRIDE, Case No. 1:25-cv-00444-KES-EPG 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS’ 12 v. MOTION TO DISMISS BE GRANTED 13 PETE HEGSETH, et al. , (ECF No. 12) 14 Defendants. OBJECTIONS IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 15 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Kathryn Lindberg McBride proceeds pro se in this civil action alleging that 19 Defendants—who are various government officials—violated her rights in connection with her 20 prior employment as a dual-status…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Ziglar v. AbbasiSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.