Legal Opinion

In Re Steffensen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1935No. 5557PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

On complaint filed with the Utah State Bar and after hearing before the disciplinary committee and the making and filing of findings of fact and recommendations by such committee, the board of commissioners of the Utah State Bar approved the findings and recommendations of such committee and recommended to this court that K. K. Stef-fensen, an attorney at law duly licensed to practice and practicing law in all the courts of this state, be suspended from the practice of law for the period of three months and until he paid the costs of these proceedings. Mr. Steffensen petitioned this court for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re LentzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  2. In Re DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re SteffensenUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  2. In Re HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API