Legal Opinion

Metzger v. O'Donoghue

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 3, 1923No. 3861PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMYTH, Chief Justice.

The Committee on Grievances of the Su- ' preme Court of the District of Columbia investigated a complaint against Percy Metzger, a member of the bar of that court, and reported that the committee deemed the facts as ascertained by them to be sufficient to support the complaint, and recommended that Metzger be called upon to answer. He was duly notified, and he answered. The matter was tried by the court in general term; the chief justice and two associate justices sitting. A great deal of testimony was taken. The court, one justice dissenting, found Metzger guilty, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. List v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. United States v. DunneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
  4. American Diamond Rock-Boring v. SheldonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. In re LentzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Javits v. StevensDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  2. Hazel Cobb v. Pete GilmerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  3. Howard v. WilburCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
  4. Howard v. WilburCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API