Legal Opinion

Adrian v. Elmer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 11, 1955No. 39,765PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.:

This was an action to recover the purchase price of a registered Hereford bull, and damages resulting from an alleged breach of an express warranty.

Appellees Phil H. Adrian and John W. Hertzler, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, were a partnership doing business as Twin Oak Farm. The appellant Dr. R. F. Elmer, a resident of Denver, Colorado, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was doing business as Bob White Hereford Farms in Dickinson County. His manager in charge of the Hereford farms was Kenneth Skelley.

Plaintiffs’ petition alleged…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Will v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  2. Aultman Thrashing & Engine Co. v. KnollSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Montague v. BurgerhoffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Topeka Mill & Elevator Co. v. TriplettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. Isaacs v. Jackson Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Corral v. Rollins Protective Services Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  2. Theis v. duPont, Glore Forgan Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Flax v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  4. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  5. Young & Cooper, Inc. v. VestringSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API