Legal Opinion

Mavco, Inc. v. Eggink

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 23, 2007No. A05-2018PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice.

Approximately four months after filing a mechanic’s lien statement against Rodney and Karla Eggink’s real property and serving a copy of the statement on the Egginks, Mavco, Inc. commenced an action in Sherburne County District Court to foreclose its lien. Three days before Mav-co filed its complaint, summons, and notice of lis pendens, the Egginks granted a mortgage on their property to Wells Fargo Bank. More than two months after Mavco commenced its action, Wells Fargo recorded its mortgage. Mavco was unaware of the mortgage when it filed its complaint and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. ILHC OF EAGAN, LLC v. County of DakotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. SHAMROCK DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. LamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. In Re StadsvoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. In re Application of Skyline Materials, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  5. In re Civil Commitment of LonerganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API