Legal Opinion

Forte v. Caruso

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 11, 1957PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.

This is a bill in equity seeking specific performance of an option for the reconveyance of real estate contained in a purchase and sale agreement, signed by the buyer but not by his wife and not recorded. The facts have been found by a master in a report filed March 26, 1956. The case turns primarily on the construction of the language of the option hmiting the time for its exercise.

The important relevant provisions of the agreement are these: “It is agreed that the Seller has an option to repurchase said premises for the same price, plus the cost of any improvements made by the Buyer,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Clark v. State Street Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. Zarum v. Brass Mill Materials Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  3. Ober v. National Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Detwiler v. CaponeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Shayeb v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Sherman v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP. LTD.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  2. McMahon v. Monarch Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  3. Edwin R. Sage Co. v. FoleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  4. Limpus v. ArmstrongMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  5. Dickson v. Riverside Iron Works, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API