Legal Opinion

Dickson v. Riverside Iron Works, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 22, 1978PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, C.J.

This action, based on an "employment contract,” was tried to a jury, and at the conclusion of the evidence the judge directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff on the issue of the defendant’s liability on the contract. The jury then assessed damages in the amount of $51,621, and the defendant has appealed. There was no error.

The evidence was undisputed that on February 2,1972, the parties executed an employment contract in writing whereby Star Steel Corporation (Star) agreed to employ the plaintiff, Murray S. Dickson (Dickson), for a period of five years at a salary of $27,000, plus ten per…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Federal Maritime Commission v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Maynard v. Royal Worcester Corset Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Charles I. Hosmer, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. McKenna v. Commissioner of Mental HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  5. Black v. School Committee of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Boston Edison Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, City of Holyoke Gas and Electric Department, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. National Medical Care, Inc. v. ZigelbaumMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  3. Redgrave v. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1983
  4. Fay, Spofford & Thorndike, Inc. v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. Braga v. Genlyte Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API