Legal Opinion
McMahon v. Monarch Life Insurance
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 21, 1962PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKirk, J.
The plaintiff (McMahon), pursuant to the provisions of G-. L. c. 231A, seeks an adjudication of his right to termination commissions under an agent’s contract with the defendant Monarch Life Insurance Company (Monarch). Monarch contends that McMahon has violated the post-employment terms of his contract and consequently has lost his right to termination commissions. After trial, a decree was entered adjudging that McMahon had not violated the contract and ordering Monarch to pay termination commissions in the sum of $3,451.38 with interest. Monarch appealed.
The case comes to us with a report…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cardullo v. LandauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Birnbaum v. PamoukisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Sherman v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP. LTD.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Hiller v. Submarine Signal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Warner v. Selectmen of AmherstMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- J. A. Sullivan Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- USM Corp. v. Arthur D. Little Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Shea v. Bay State Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Lafayette Place Associates v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Pritam SinghCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.