Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Ferguson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1996No. S-6764PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal presents two related questions: (1) whether an interest in an Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) for halibut and sa-blefish is property subject to division if marital, and (2) how the marital portion of this interest should be determined. We hold that the superior court correctly treated the interest in the IFQ as property subject to division if marital, but abused its discretion in determining that the entire interest in the IFQ at issue was marital property.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Donald J. Ferguson and Lori Beth Ferguson were married in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. ApokedakAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Moffitt v. MoffittAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Doyle v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Chotiner v. ChotinerAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Brosnan v. BrosnanAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McGee v. McGeeAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Johns v. JohnsAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. California Chamber of Commerce v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Young v. KellyAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Battley v. Schmitz (In Re Schmitz)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API