Scofield v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Board of Governors of the State Bar of California that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for six months.
Questions: First. Is the conclusion reasonably warranted that petitioner, in representing a husband and wife who suffered damages in two rear end automobile collisions a week apart, knowingly and wilfully asserted claims against the insured owner of the other car in each case for items of special damage resulting from both accidents combined?
Yes. The burden is upon one seeking a review of a recommendation of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pickering v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McKinney v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Coviello v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. BensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- People v. BensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Diane MILLER and Pamela Lewis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FAIRCHILD INDUSTRIES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Lewis v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Garlow v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. ScofieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Barreiro v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.