Legal Opinion
Bethel v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority
Mohegan Gaming Disputes Court of Appeals
Decided June 15, 2000No. GDCA-T-98-500PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FACTS
I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The plaintiff, Darius Bethel, appeals from the judgment rendered following the trial court’s granting of the defendants’ motion to dismiss as to all twelve counts of his complaint. The Bethel claims were brought against the defendants, Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (MTGA), Mohegan Tribal Gaming Enterprise (MTGE), Mohegan Tribal Nation a/k/a the Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut (MTN), James K. Keane and Raul Ruiz. The claims of the plaintiff against all defendants include intentional tort claims for assault (Count 1), battery (Count 2), false imprisonment…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Weeks Construction, Inc. v. Oglala Sioux Housing Authority, United States of America, and Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Worthen v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2001
- Bartha v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Court of Appeals · 2005
- Tomsky v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Court of Appeals · 2005
- LaVigne v. Mohegan Tribe of Indians of ConnecticutMohegan Trial Court · 2005
- Tomsky v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.