Legal Opinion

Utah County v. Orem City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1985No. 19108, 19131 and 19138PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

Defendants Orem City, Payson City, and Pleasant Grove City appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of plaintiff Utah County. The trial judge concluded that the defendant cities have a legal duty to pay Utah County the reasonable costs incurred in housing, feeding, and booking prisoners confined to the county jail for violating city ordinances. We agree.

The case was submitted to the trial court on stipulated facts. Defendants Orem City, Payson City, and Pleasant Grove City confine prisoners convicted of violating city ordinances to the Utah County jail. Until 1977,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Board of Education of the Granite School District v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Murray City v. HallUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Grand Forks County v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State, Ex Rel. Cannon v. LearyUtah Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Clover v. Snowbird Ski ResortUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Savage Industries, Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Maxfield v. HerbertUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Smith v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API