Legal Opinion

Maxfield v. Herbert

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 2012No. 20110425PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice LEE,

opinion of the Court:

T1 Stephen Maxfield challenged the results of the 2010 gubernatorial election under Utah's election-contest statute, UTax® Cop® § 20A-4-402, asking the district court to declare him and his running mate the lieutenant governor and governor of Utah, respectively. The court dismissed the petition, concluding that the statutory grounds for an election contest did not encompass Max-field's claims. We affirm.

*650I

12 Stephen Maxfield ran for Heutenant governor in Utah's November 2010 gubernatorial election. Maxfield and his running mate, Farley Anderson, finished third.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Peterson v. Coca-Cola USAUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Slisze v. Stanley-BostitchUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Utah County v. Orem CityUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Clayton v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. CantonUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Salo v. TylerUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. BagnesUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  4. M.J. v. WisanUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2017

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API