Legal Opinion

Stump v. Burnett

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 10, 1903No. 13,283PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from Sumner district court; Jambs Lawrence, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The question in this case involves the right to impeaeh, by way of defense, for defects in the proceedings upon which it is based, a tax deed, valid on its face, when used as the foundation for an action of ejectment brought by the tax-title holder more than seven years after the recording of the deed, the land having remained vacant and unoccupied until within two years of the commencement of suit.

Burnett claims title to outdot 12-J-, city of Caldwell, under a tax deed for that tract, together with out-lots 14 and 15 in the same city, issued…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walker v. BohSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. Coale v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  3. Harris v. CurranSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Muckenthaler v. NollerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Denny v. StevensWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Girard Trust Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Trager v. ElliottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Nicholson v. HaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API