Legal Opinion
Theriault v. Quinlan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 15, 1985No. 84 Civ. 6007 (RWS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The government has moved for reargument of this court’s May 21, 1985, 609 F.Supp. 733, opinion (“opinion”) which granted one of Dr. Harry Theriault’s (“Theriault”) claims in his petition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This motion is granted in part and denied in part.
The opinion held that the Parole Commission’s denial of Theriault's request to call witnesses, without a contemporaneous finding and explanation of a substantial reason for not so allowing, violated 18 U.S.C. § 4214(a)(2)(D). The government, relying on Ponte v. Real, —…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ponte v. RealSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dennis Luther v. Vincent MolinaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Billiteri v. United States Board Of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States Ex Rel. Hitchcock v. KentonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1966
- Silberberg v. U. S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- John v. AljetsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
- Theriault v. QuinlanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986