Legal Opinion
John v. Aljets
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 14, 2001No. CIV.01-57(DSD/JMM)Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John M. Mason dated July 25, 2001. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.
Based upon the Report and Recommen- ‘ dation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein, the Court does not rule on the legality of Petitioner’s detention or the merits of his Petition at this time, but concludes that remand is required. Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the matter shall…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Stewart v. Martinez-VillarealSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Kulvir Singh Barapind v. Janet Reno, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- SKF USA Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.