Legal Opinion

People v. Collins

California Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1968No. Crim. 11176PublishedCited by 183 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

We deal here with the novel question whether evidence of mathematical probability has been properly introduced and used by the prosecution in a criminal ease. While we discern no inherent incompatibility between the disciplines of law and mathematics and intend no general disapproval or disparagement of the latter as an auxiliary in the fact-finding processes of the former, we cannot uphold the technique employed in the instant case, As we explain in detail, infra, the testimony as to mathematical probability infected the case with fatal error and distorted the jury’s ^traditional role of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Whitus v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by183 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. DuncanTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. PrideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API