Legal Opinion

State v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 2, 1984No. 8328SC1134PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendant contends the court erred in denying his motion to suppress his confession. We agree, and accordingly award a new trial.

The voir dire hearing on the motion to suppress established without contradiction that the confession was made under the following circumstances:

In late September 1981, defendant was arrested in Tennessee on charges of attempted burglary and possession of burglary tools. He was released on bond and returned to his home in Kentucky.

Defendant appeared at a preliminary hearing in Tennessee in mid-October 1981. At that hearing Tennessee authorities…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. PruittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1827
  3. State v. CorleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. FuquaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SturgillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. State v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API