Legal Opinion

State v. Floyd

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1911PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Application by M. E. Floyd for a writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

Morgan, Oh. J.

Petition for a writ of habeas corpus based, upon the following facts, as shown by the petition and the sheriff’s return to the writ: Petitioner was regularly informed against for the crime of robbery, and placed on trial before the district court of Foster county. The issue of guilt was submitted to the jury, and after considering the evidence they came into court and announced that they were unable to agree upon a verdict. s Thereupon the court discharged the jury from further consideration of the case. The petitioner was not present in court at the time of the discharge of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. NielsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Ex Parte BigelowSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. State v. BeaverstallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Ex parte MaxwellNevada Supreme Court · 1876
  5. State ex rel. Noonan v. Sheriff of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ryan v. NygaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State Ex Rel. Smith v. LeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Re SolbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State Ex Rel. Neville v. OverbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Mazakahomni v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API