Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Noonan v. Sheriff of Hennepin County

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 11, 1877PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Habeas corpus issued from this court, and directed to the respondent as the sheriff of Hennepin county.

1Opinion of the CourtCornell, J.

The return to the writ issued in this case shows the following facts: At the general term of the district court of the fourth judicial district, begun and holden in and for the county of Hennepin, on the eighth day of May, 1877, a bill of indictment was duly found and presented in said court, by the grand jury of said county, against the.said relator, for the crime of murder. Being then in custody, under commitment theretofore duly issued upon a preliminary examination for the same offence, the relator was duly arraigned upon the indictment, and in answer thereto personally entered the plea…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. People Ex Rel. Tweed v. . LiscombNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Petition of SemlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Smith v. HessIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. State ex rel. Blaisdell v. BillingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. State ex rel. Platzer v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. Ex parte TiceOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. State Ex Rel. Dufault v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API