Legal Opinion

State v. Beaverstall

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1903PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Wesley Styles, after a preliminary examination before a committing magistrate, was held to answer upon a charge of manslaughter in the first degree, committed upon the person of one Peter J. Selseth. He was committed in default of bail, and petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that there was not sufficient or probable cause to justify his commitment and detention.

1Opinion of the CourtCochrane, J.

Wesley Styles petitioned this court for a writ of habeas corpus. A stipulation was entered into in open court by the counsel for respective parties, whereby the entire matter is-to be disposed of upon the petition for the writ. The physical presence of petitioner before the court was waived, and it was agreed that if, upon a hearing, the court should determine that petitioner-*529was entitled to his release, the writ should forthwith issue; otherwise its denial should be taken as a finale to this proceeding.

Petitioner was arrested and taken before a justice of the peace of Benson county, in this…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. NielsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. State ex rel. Durner v. HueginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Miskimmins v. ShaverWyoming Supreme Court · 1899
  4. State ex rel. City of Augusta v. LosbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Ex parte DegenerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Eureka County Bank Habeas Corpus CasesNevada Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Winnovich v. EmeryUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State Ex Rel. Smith v. LeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  4. In re BaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Knapp v. TolanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API