Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. United States
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MILTON L. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
The court heard the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on February 21, 1985. Plaintiffs were represented by Lester J. Marston and Henry J. Sockbeson. Defendants were represented by Pamela S. West and Louis A. Demás. Following oral argument, the court requested that the parties submit supplemental briefing by April 22, 1985. Having duly considered the respective positions of the parties as presented in their briefs and at oral argument, the court now renders its decision.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are an individual Native American,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- T H Agriculture & Nutrition Co. v. Aceto Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. California · 1995
- Westlands Water District v. PattersonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1995
- Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. US, BUR. OF INDIAN AFF.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1989
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.