Legal Opinion
Westlands Water District v. Patterson
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 9, 1995No. CV-F-94-5217 OWWPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE, DEFENDANTS’ AND INTERVENORS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WANGER, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiffs Westlands Water District (“Westlands”) and San Benito County Water District (“San Benito, collectively “the Districts”) move to dismiss their Complaint without prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2). The motion is opposed by the Federal Defendants, the Exchange Contractors, 1 and the Friant Intervenors. 2 The Federal Defendants, the Exchange Contractors, and the Friant Intervenors move for…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Westlands Water District v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- San Luis Unit Food Producers v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Stockton East Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Westlands Water District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Friant Water Authority v. JewellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.