Legal Opinion
T H Agriculture & Nutrition Co. v. Aceto Chemical Co.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 12, 1995No. CV-F-93-5404 OWW DLBPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: CERTAIN DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; STAUFFER CHEMICAL COMPANY AND RHÓNE-POU-LENC MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WANGER, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Defendants Eli Lilly & Company, Mont-rose Chemical Corporation of California, PureGro Company, Hercules, Inc., Miles, Inc., and Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals (collectively “Certain Defendants”) move for partial summary judgment against plaintiff T H Agriculture & Nutrition Company’s (“THAN”) claims for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(2) and (3), and claims for joint and several…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a California Corporation v. City of Lodi, California, Jack Sieglock, in His Capacity as Mayor of the City of Lodi Richard Prima, Jr., in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650 Randall A. Hays, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi City Attorney Michael C. Donovan, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Adam L. Babich, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Steven H. Doto, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Bret A. Stone, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney John R. Till, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Zevnik, Horton, Guibord and McGovern Llp, Individually and in Their Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorneys Fran E. Forkas, in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650, Unigard Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation Unigard Security Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation v. City of LodiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Pinal Creek Group v. Newmont Mining Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- FMC Corp. v. Vendo Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2002
- Pinal Creek Group v. Newmont Mining CorpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Town of New Windsor v. Tesa Tuck, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.