Ex Parte Brannon
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Gilbert Brannon pleaded guilty to possession of controlled substances. At the sentencing hearing, the prosecutor produced certified copies of three prior felony convictions (none of which was drug-related). Brannon was then sentenced under Ala. Code 1975, § 13A-5-9 (hereinafter the "Habitual Felony Offender Act"). The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed, without opinion. 524 So.2d 387.* We granted certiorari to decide whether the sentencing of Brannon under the Habitual Felony Offender Act conflicts with our decision in Ex parte Chambers, 522 So.2d 313 (Ala. 1987). We find that it does, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bartone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ex Parte ChambersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
3Cited by80 opinions
- Cantu v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Lancaster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
- Ex Parte RiversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.