Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Chambers

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 6, 1987No. 86-483PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted the writ in this case to consider whether it was proper for the trial court to apply the punishment enhancement provisions of Code of 1975, § 13A-5-9(a)(1), in sentencing the petitioner, who was convicted of a drug offense. We reverse and remand.

Petitioner, Richard Chambers, was indicted for trafficking in marihuana, but a jury found him guilty only of felony possession. The State proved a prior drug offense, and, pursuant to § 13A-5-9(a)(1), (hereinafter the "Habitual Felony Offender Act"), the trial court sentenced the petitioner as a habitual offender to 20 years' imprisonment…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  2. Dickerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  3. Palmer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  4. Aplin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Motley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BrannonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Jones v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API