Legal Opinion

Cantu v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 16, 1994No. 1920426PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion

On Application for Rehearing

2Per curiam

The opinion of October 15, 1993, is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted therefor.

This Court granted the State’s petition for a writ of certiorari, to review the question whether a criminal defendant is precluded from raising, in a post-conviction proceeding, a defect in the Boykin colloquy,1 specifically, the failure of the trial judge to properly advise the defendant of the maximum sentence he could receive if he entered a plea of guilty. See, Rule 14.4(a)(1), Ala.R.Crim.P. Stated differently, the question is: If the trial judge fails to strictly…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Bartone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  4. Ex Parte BrannonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Ex Parte RiversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by103 opinions

  1. Mobile Infirmary Medical Center v. HodgenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Ex Parte Elba Gen. Hosp. and Nursing Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Gordon v. NagleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. A.M.F. v. Tuscaloosa County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. Parish v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API