San Diego Lumber Co. v. Wooldredge
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
— This action is to forclose a lien for materials furnished defendant Smith, as contractor, for building a house for defendant Wooldredge. The other defendants were lienors.
*577Williams & Whitmore were the only lien claimants who answered.
The contract price for the building was $1,945, all of which had been paid except $505. Plaintiffs demand was for $748.86.
Williams & Whitmore recovered judgment for $145.50, and $50 as an attorney’s fee.
On the trial, various objections were made to plaintiff’s notice of lien, all of which, however, are only modifications of the general one, “ that it…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Yancy v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Burnett v. GlasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Sweet v. Fresno Hotel Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Stearns-Roger Manufacturing Co. v. Aztec Gold Mining & Milling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1908
- Brill v. De TurkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.