Legal Opinion

Rempel v. Nationwide Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 1977No. 4PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANDERINO, Justice.

In April, 1961, appellee’s husband, Harry Rempel, purchased a thirty-year mortgage protection policy from appellant, Nationwide Life Insurance Company, Inc., through Nationwide’s agent, appellant, Reid W. Mc-Gibbeny. The policy was designed to pay to the beneficiary, appellee, Dolores I. Rempel, an amount approximately equal to the outstanding mortgage balance, if any, on the Rempel home when the insured, appellee’s husband, Harry Rempel, died. In July, 1961, appellee Rempel, upon instructions from her husband, again contacted McGibbeny and asked whether Nationwide…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bardwell v. the Willis CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Evans v. MarksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Dowling v. Merchants InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. TAYLOR v. CroweSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Swan v. Watertown Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Eisenberg v. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Toy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Bilt-Rite Contractors, Inc. v. Architectural StudioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Collister v. Nationwide Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. Diversified Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API