Legal Opinion
Simmons v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 4, 1975No. 46724PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Justice:
The question presented by Appellant is whether, as to him, the vehicle in which he was riding at the time of the accident in question was uninsured within the meaning of Title 36 O.S.1971, § 3636 [Uninsured Motorist Coverage], and the insurance policies then in force.
Appellant Simmons’ injuries and damages were admittedly caused by the negligence of the driver of the car in which he was a passenger. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company [Hartford] had issued a policy of insurance on the automobile in which Appellant was riding, with limits of $5,000.00 for injury to one person…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Detrick v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Smiley v. Estate of ToneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
- Darrah v. California State Automobile Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Kemp v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Strunk v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Blackburn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Tudor v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
- Ziegelmayer v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
- Emery Ex Rel. Hietfeld v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.