Deming v. Maas
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. E. P. Mogan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The plaintiffs brought this action against the defendants to recover the sum of $525 for rent alleged to be due said plaintiffs.
The action was tried by the court, without a jury, and the plaintiffs were given judgment in the sum of $5.75.31..From said judgment and the order denying him a new trial, the defendant, Herrscher, prosecutes this appeal.
The action is founded on a certain bond, of which more hereafter.
It appears from the complaint that on or about the twenty-fifth day of March, 1907, by a written lease, bearing date March 23, 1907, the plaintiffs demised and delivered into the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Relley v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Rutz v. ObearCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
3Cited by7 opinions
- Morgan Clark v. MillsapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Wittmann v. WhittinghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Bryan v. BanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- United States Farm Land Co. v. BennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.