Legal Opinion

Relley v. Campbell

California Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1901No. Sac. No. 748PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

—This is an action to foreclose a mortgage upon mining property. The mortgage, on its face, purports to have been given by Patrick Campbell and the New Blue Point Mining Company, a corporation. In form, the complaint attempts to state two causes of action, — in reality, but one. It contains averments proper in a complaint for foreclosure, with statements tending to show that in fact the corporation is, as to the property involved, but another name for Patrick Campbell, and that he made representations designed to convince plaintiff that the mortgage was regularly executed by the corporation…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Morgan Clark v. MillsapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Judelson v. American Metal Bearing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Richman v. Bank of PerrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. The Wood Estate Co. v. ChanslorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API