Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Irwin Memorial Blood Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 9, 1993No. A054946PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERLEY, J.

In Osborn v. Irwin Memorial Blood Bank (1992) 5 Cal.App.4th 234, 271 [7 Cal.Rptr.2d 101], we held that a blood bank sued for negligent failure to safeguard its blood supply is subject to a professional standard of care. Thus, if negligent failure to prevent transmission of the AIDS virus is alleged, it must be shown that the blood bank failed to exercise the degree of care ordinarily exercised by other blood banks under similar circumstances. (Id., at p. 272.) In Osborn, we found no substantial evidence that the blood testing performed by Irwin Memorial Blood Bank in February…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Irwin Memorial Blood BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Brown v. ColmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Smith v. Paslode Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1992

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Advincula v. United Blood ServicesIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Ward v. Lutheran Hospitals & Homes Society of America, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Spann v. Irwin Memorial Blood CentersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. N.N v. v. American Ass'n of Blood BanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Brown v. United Blood ServicesNevada Supreme Court · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API