Legal Opinion

Brown v. United Blood Services

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1993No. 21686PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This difficult case invokes an examination of the law pertaining to a blood bank’s liability to a transfusion recipient who developed the AIDS virus after receiving blood from an infected donor. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the activities of blood banks at issue herein are subject to a professional standard of care, and that appellant failed to show at trial that the procedures adopted and followed by respondent United Blood Services fell below this standard. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for entry of judgment in favor of United Blood Services.

FACTS

On June 5,…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United Blood Services v. QuintanaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Osborn v. Irwin Memorial Blood BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Hines v. St. Joseph's HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Kozup v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
  5. Stephen Kozup v. Georgetown University, D/B/A Georgetown University Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Advincula v. United Blood ServicesIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. DeBoer v. Senior Bridges of Sparks Family Hospital, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
  3. N.N v. v. American Ass'n of Blood BanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Advincula v. United Blood ServicesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Doe v. American National Red CrossDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API