Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1937No. 33,501PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*786The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was a suit in partition. Plaintiff prevailed, and four defendants appeal.

Appellee, James M. Hoover, claims a fractional interest in the real estate by virtue of certain conveyances from devisees under the will of Edward Roberts, Sr., deceased. The will was duly probated on November 22, 1922, and has not been contested. The appellant, Blanche Hyland, contends the trial court erred in holding she had only a one-eighth interest instead of a one-fifth interest in the land involved. She acquired the interest of Walter Ware, who in turn had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roxana Petroleum Corp. v. JarvisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. Platt v. WoodlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  3. Hoover v. RobertsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Kistler v. Fitzpatrick Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Costello v. GrahamArizona Supreme Court · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Estate of Johnson v. BasslerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Bindley v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  3. Realty Securities & Discount Co. v. National Rubber & Leather Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Campbell v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  5. Cessna v. CarrollSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API