Legal Opinion

Roxana Petroleum Corp. v. Jarvis

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 12, 1929No. 28,431PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burgh, J.:

The action was one by the holder of an oil lease to enjoin encroachment on its privileges and to quiet title to its leasehold interest against claimants under rival leases. The land involved is a railroad right of way. The fundamental question was whether deeds in plaintiff’s chain of title were effective to convey what for brevity and convenience is usually spoken of as the fee of the land servient to the right of way. Plaintiff was denied relief, and appeals.

The interests of all parties were derived from Leonard K. Scrog-gin. In 1911…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Abercrombie v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Marks v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Platt v. WoodlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Center Bridge Co. v. Wheeler & Howes Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  5. Rice v. Clear Spring Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Wood v. HatcherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. Jennings v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Barker v. LashbrookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. Kassner v. Alexander Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API