Legal Opinion

Platt v. Woodland

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 12, 1926No. 26,755PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one against Ida F. Woodland, who will be referred to as the defendant, for possession of land, for par*292tition, and for rents and profits. The answer admitted possession of defendant, exclusion of plaintiffs from possession, and receipt and appropriation of rents and profits. The answer further denied title in plaintiffs, asserted title in defendant, and prayed that her title be quieted. Defendant recovered, and plaintiffs appeal.

Defendant-was the wife of Stanley Woodland, who was joined as a defendant, but had no interest in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Johnson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  3. Clendening v. WyattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  4. McCartney v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Simpson v. GreeleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1871

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Barker v. LashbrookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. Roxana Petroleum Corp. v. JarvisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Central Natural Resources, Inc. v. Davis Operating Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. Shell Petroleum Corporation v. HollowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  5. CASS-WARNER CORPORATION v. BrickmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API