Legal Opinion
Barrett v. Pepco Holdings
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 17, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2017-0107PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Amit P. Mehta, United States District-Judge
• In this discrimination case, Plaintiff Deborah Barrett claims that Defendant Pepeo Holdings discriminated against her on the basis of her race, gender, and age, as well as retaliated against her for exercising her protected statutory rights. Before the court are the following motions: (1) Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment; . (2) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss; and (3) Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend. For the reasons herein, the court denies Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment and grants in part Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Baloch v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lemus v. Grover Montano Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Pinson v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Ross v. BlinkenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Stewart v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Thomas v. PowerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.