Legal Opinion

Ross v. Blinken

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 5, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2024-2969Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KIMBERLY ROSS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-02969 (CJN) MARCO RUBIO, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Kimberly Ross claims that her employer, the State Department, discriminated against her based on race, sex, and age, and also retaliated against her for protected conduct. The Government moves to dismiss; for the reasons below, the Court grants the Government’s motion. I. Background Ross, an African American woman born in 1970, was hired as the Director of the Office of Global Publishing Solutions at the State…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API