Legal Opinion

Lemus v. Grover Montano Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 5, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2023-0108Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JESUS LEMUS ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 23-CV-00108-RMM ) GROVER MONTANO et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to file an amended complaint, ECF No. 33. Dr. Jesus Lemus (“Dr. Lemus” or “Plaintiff”) proceeded pro se in this case for nearly a year, but he now seeks leave to file his first amended complaint with the benefit of retained counsel. After holding a status conference discussing Plaintiff’s intent to move to file an amended complaint, the Court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  3. Mississippi Ass'n of Cooperatives v. Farmers Home AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
  4. Equity Group, Ltd. v. Painewebber Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1993
  5. Onyewuchi v. GonzalezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API