Markley v. Godfrey
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 85, Jan. T., 1915, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Berks Co., Sept. T., 1913, No. 39, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Benjamin H. Markley v. Hamilton Godfrey. Assumpsit for breach of contract to purchase real estate.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 85, Jan. T., 1915, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Berks Co., Sept. T., 1913, No. 39, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Benjamin H. Markley v. Hamilton Godfrey. Assumpsit for breach of contract to purchase real estate. The facts appear in the following opinion by Endlich, P. J.: The defendant, on Sept. 23, 1911, sold to the plaintiff house and lot No. 232 Clymer street, together with the adjoining lot, both being subject to a mortgage given by defendant for $5,000. On the same day, the parties executed an instrument under seal, in which, in consideration of said purchase…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned president judge of the court below discharging the rule for judgment non obstante veredicto.
2Cited by9 opinions
- Riddle Co. v. TaubelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Warner Bros. Theatres, Inc. v. ProffittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Matevish v. Ramey Borough School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Vilsack v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Hannan v. CarrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.