Legal Opinion
Matevish v. Ramey Borough School District
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 20, 1950No. Appeal, No. 84PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reno, J.,
On June 16, 1947, Matevish and the School District of the Borough of Ramey executed a written contract whereby Matevish was to supply automobile transportation for pupils of the district during the school years of 1947-8, 1948-9, and 1949-50. He rendered service during 1947-8, and was paid for it. Alleging breach of the contract, the school district cancelled it on September 8,1948. Matevish sued to recover as damages the profits he would have made had he been permitted to perform the contract during 1948-9 and 1949-50. The jury returned a verdict for him for $2058.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Commonwealth v. Sunbury School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Streilein v. VogelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Warren Tank Car Co. v. DodsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Girard Trust Co. v. Tremblay Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Corabi v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Chainey v. StreetCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Bratton v. Roadway Package System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Wayne Moving & Storage of New Jersey, Inc. v. School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Donegal Township School District v. CrosbySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.