Vilsack v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 146, Oct. T., 1920, by defendant, from order of O. P. Allegheny Co., April T., 1918, No. 1800, granting new trial after verdict for defendant in case of Maurice Yilsack v. John S. Wilson. Assumpsit for breach of contract. Before Shafer, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Yerdict for defendant for $8,340.50. The court granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. Defendant appealed. Error assigned, inter alia, was order, quoting it.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Walling,
This is an action of assumpsit for balance claimed on sale of corporate stock. The parties hereto, at Pittsburgh, on October 30,1916, entered into a written agreement for the exchange of certain real and personal property, by which the defendant Wilson, party of the second part, agreed to transfer to the plaintiff Vilsack, party of the first part, inter alia, bonds as follows, viz: “Twenty (20) six (6%) percent interest bearing bonds of the Duquesne and Dravosburg Street Eailway Company, of the par value of Ten Thousand ($10,000.00) Dollars, which the party of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Barton v. ThawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- McMillan v. Philadelphia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Leaming v. WiseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
- Ballentine v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
- Unexcelled Fire-Wks. Co. v. PolitesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Phillips Et Ux. v. TetznerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Gervis v. KaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Wallace Bank & Trust Co. v. First National Bank of FairfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Western Savings Fund Society v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Collins v. Home Ins. Co. of N. Y.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.