Legal Opinion · Dissent

Long Island Lighting Co. v. Allianz Underwriters Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 8, 2005Published

1Dissent

Ellerin and Catterson, JJ., dissent

in a memorandum by Catterson, J., as follows: Because I believe genuine issues of material fact exist, I respectfully dissent. Specifically, I believe the motion court improperly determined, as a matter of law, that notice to excess insurers Century Indemnity Company (Century) and General Reinsurance Corporation (General Re) was triggered by plaintiffs receipt of a form letter sent by the Town of Oyster Bay (Town) to 37 Long Island companies in September 1993.

Initially, both excess insurer defendants asserted that the obligation to give notice arose in 1990…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Olin Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  3. Argentina v. Otsego Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. American Home Assurance Co. v. International InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Paramount Insurance v. Rosedale Gardens, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API