Legal Opinion

American Home Assurance Co. v. International Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1997PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Titone, J.

In Unigard Sec. Ins. Co. v North Riv. Ins. Co. (79 NY2d 576), we held that, in contrast to situations involving primary liability insurance policies, the breach of the prompt-notice provisions in a reinsurance policy is not a ground for disclaiming coverage unless the reinsurer can show that it was actually prejudiced by the delay. The issue in this case is whether the analysis in Unigard should be applied to a breach of the prompt-notice clause in a policy providing excess liability coverage. Concluding that the rights and obligations of excess insurers are more…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. J. N. A. Realty Corp. v. Cross Bay Chelsea, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. McGrath v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Scott Hammersmith v. Tig Insurance Company (w.d. Of Pa. Civil Nos. 02-Cv-01829 & 03-Cv-01333)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. Argo Corp. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Alcazar v. HayesTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Ferrando v. Auto-Owners Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. The Matter of Viking Pump Inc. and Warren Pumps LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2016

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API